WEEK 12 - REFLECTION AND SELF-EVALUATION
In Humanities (ACMA01), I’ve learned about familiar concepts in new ways.
New in the sense that the topics covered were always approached from an angle
that I had not thought of before. For example, when the question of “What is
History?” was discussed, it wasn’t just as simple as the definition. Aspects of
epistemology and historical construction were highlighted in terms of how
historical stories are formulated and told.
“History is a set of lies agreed upon by the victors…” This idea made me
understand why parts of certain histories seem fragmented. One thing this Humanities class did was allow me to question common ideals. It made me ponder concepts offered by a mainstream society, thus making me broaden my thought
pattern. This class also gave me the opportunity to look at the world from a non-biased perspective, and to separately consider the meaning of History, Text, Gender, Sound etc. Personally, in order to further excel in a class like this, I would recommend that I start all assignments earlier. Although I loved the content of this course, I didn't do as well as I wanted to. Other than that, I enjoyed the advanced thinking and platform that ACMA01 offered.
WEEK 11 - Does Peace Have a Chance? by John Horgan
BAR
1. I think that Horgan does not address the opposing view
because he wants the readers to really believe that war is not a necessity. In
paragraph 14, he states that the idea that war will ‘never end’ helps to
perpetuate it (Paragraph 14). And if he included this idea abundantly within
his essay, then that could also contribute to its perpetuation. This essay was
meant to inform readers of the negative impact of war as well as highlight that
war is not innate, but rather a developed psychological concept that can be halted
with the implementation of alternatives.
TS/IS
WEEK 10 - Burning Mistry by Alberto Manguel
BAR
1. Manguel begins with the comparison of the Chinese Emperor
Shih Huang-ti and the Shiv Sena students because even though the events are
thousands of years apart, they still heavily relate. The Chinese Emperor wanted
to rid the world of his mothers adultery by burning all records of Chinese
written history (paragraph 4), and even by doing this, it did not fully
eliminate the idea that had already spread. Similarly, the Shih Huang-ti
proceeded to burn Mistry books because of a mere mention of the Mumbai students
and their suspected criminal actions. In both cases, as mentioned later in the
essay, there was no ultimate depletion of knowledge and the burning of books
was unnecessary. The burning and disrespecting of literature did not constitute
or do anything towards their cases. In paragraph 7, the author further states
that the burning of books throughout history has never succeeded in doing what
it was set to do, and that the action just made these entities seem cowardly.
TS/IS
2.
a) In making a case for the medical use of marijuana, I am
not saying that it should be used irresponsibly and therefore cause a
disturbance to society.
b) But my argument will do more than prove that one
particular industrial chemical has certain properties. In this article, I will
also target other chemicals that induce similar reactions as the main one
aforementioned.
c) My point about the national obsessions with sports
reinforce the belief held by many that the showcasing of sports may be
referred to as a religion or a strict culture.
d) I believe, therefore, that the war is completely
unjustified. But let me back up and explain how I arrived at this conclusion: So
many people die at the hands of war in order for there to be a chance of life
and liberty. The whole concept is ironically misplaced. I came to believe that this war is a big
mistake.
WEEK 9 - Is Scientific Progress Inevitable? by Andrew Irvine
BAR
2. a) Throughout history, science has fascinated and excited
people so much that discoveries, inventions etc. and its knowledge have been
thought to be inevitable. We spend very little time embracing the scientific
knowledge we have now, and more time trying to expand and create more. We never
stop to think that scientific progress may cease and the world may continue at
a pace science may not catch up to. I think that it is up to the human race to
take a minute to appreciate our increasingly advanced world instead of pushing
scientific discovery into exhaustion.
b) Science has done so much for the world that it is only
fair that we protect it. The rush and power that science produces can also
become obsolete. This is why the improvement and care for scientific methods is
needed in order to help ensure that it remains effective.
TS/IS
1.
ORIGINAL
The literature review covers what others have said on your
topic. The analysis allows you to present and support your own response. In the
introduction you indicate whether you agree, disagree, or some combination of
both with what others have said. You will want to expand on how you have formed
your opinion and why others should care about your topic…
DRESSED DOWN
The literature review contains the buzz on the street about
your topic. If you’re digging the analysis, you can present and support a
response of your own. Whether you hate
it or you love it, or a lil’ bit of both, make sure to explain in your
introduction. Make your ideas crystal clear so it convinces others to care
about what you’re chirping about…
DRESSED UP
The literature review contains a detailed synopsis on the
opinions of various intellectuals. The analysis gives you the opportunity to
validate your response through the addiction of supporting elements. Based on
your personal conflictions, and what others have stated in the review, create
an introduction that concisely states your thought process. Include ways in
which you’ve formed your ideas in order for your topic to be deemed relevant...
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)